Comparison

Colin d'Alaska provençale vs Colin d’Alaska à la bordelaise

Overall, Colin d'Alaska provençale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientColin d'Alaska provençaleColin d’Alaska à la bordelai...
Nutri-Score a c
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 79 kcal 126 kcal
Fat 3.3 g 7.7 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 3.8 g
Sugars 1.7 g 0.9 g
Salt 0.6 g 0.7 g
Fiber 0.8 g —
Protein 9.3 g 10 g
Additives10
AllergensFishNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Colin d'Alaska provençale has 37% fewer calories (79 kcal vs 126 kcal).
  • Colin d'Alaska provençale has 57% less fat (3.3 g vs 7.7 g).
  • Colin d'Alaska provençale has 92% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 3.8 g).
  • Colin d’Alaska à la bordelaise has 47% less sugar (0.9 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Colin d'Alaska provençale has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Colin d'Alaska provençale lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Colin d'Alaska provençale

Colin d'Alaska MSC 51%, tomates 11,2%, eau, jus de tomates 4,8%, double concentré de tomates 4,2%, oignons 3,5%, poivrons rouges 3,2%, aubergines grillées 2,5%, courgettes grillées 2,5%, fenouil 2,5%, poivrons jaunes 2,2%, huile d'olive vierge 1,5%, huile de colza, basilic, amidon transformé de maïs, sel, ail, thym.

Colin d’Alaska à la bordelaise

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Colin d'Alaska provençale or Colin d’Alaska à la bordelaise?

Overall, Colin d'Alaska provençale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Colin d'Alaska provençale has fewer calories: 79 kcal versus 126 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Colin d’Alaska à la bordelaise has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons