Colin d’Alaska à la bordelaise vs Crunchy 100% Merlu
Overall, Crunchy 100% Merlu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Colin d’Alaska à la bordelai... | Crunchy 100% Merlu |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 126 kcal | 186 kcal |
| Fat | 7.7 g | 7.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.8 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 1.3 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.4 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 10.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish, Gluten, Blé, Poisson |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Colin d’Alaska à la bordelaise has 32% fewer calories (126 kcal vs 186 kcal).
- Crunchy 100% Merlu has 74% less saturated fat (1 g vs 3.8 g).
- Colin d’Alaska à la bordelaise has 31% less sugar (0.9 g vs 1.3 g).
- Crunchy 100% Merlu has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Crunchy 100% Merlu lists: Fish, Gluten, Blé, Poisson.
Ingredients
Colin d’Alaska à la bordelaise
Not available.
Crunchy 100% Merlu
Merlu blanc (poisson) (58%) (Merluccius productus), farine de blé (gluten), huile végétale: voir lot [G (Tournesol), N (Colza)], eau, levure, amidon de blé (gluten), dextrose de maïs, sel et extrait d'épices (paprika et curcuma)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Colin d’Alaska à la bordelaise or Crunchy 100% Merlu?
Overall, Crunchy 100% Merlu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Colin d’Alaska à la bordelaise has fewer calories: 126 kcal versus 186 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Colin d’Alaska à la bordelaise has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.