Comparison

Colin d’Alaska à la bordelaise vs Colin d'Alaska

Overall, Colin d'Alaska has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientColin d’Alaska à la bordelai...Colin d'Alaska
Nutri-Score c b
NOVA group — 4
Calories 126 kcal 173 kcal
Fat 7.7 g 9.5 g
Saturated fat 3.8 g 1.3 g
Sugars 0.9 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.7 g 0.7 g
Fiber — 0.9 g
Protein 10 g 13 g
Additives04
AllergensNone listedFish, Gluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Colin d’Alaska à la bordelaise has 27% fewer calories (126 kcal vs 173 kcal).
  • Colin d’Alaska à la bordelaise has 19% less fat (7.7 g vs 9.5 g).
  • Colin d'Alaska has 66% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 3.8 g).
  • Colin d'Alaska has 44% less sugar (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Colin d'Alaska has 23% more protein (13 g vs 10 g).
  • Colin d'Alaska has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Colin d'Alaska lists: Fish, Gluten.

Ingredients

Colin d’Alaska à la bordelaise

Not available.

Colin d'Alaska

Colin d'Alaska* (84%), farine de blé (6 %), huile de colza, amidon modifié (blé), eau, gluten de blé, sel, persil (0,5 %), agent levant (E 450, E 500, E 503), levure, dextrose, arôme naturel d'agrumes (0.1%), arôme. Peut contenir des traces de lait, d'oeuf et de moutarde. *Colin d'Alaska (Theragra chalcogramma pêché en A) Océan Pacifique Nord-Ouest FAO N° 61 ou B) Océan Pacifique Nord-Est FAO N° 67, Pêché au chalut.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Colin d’Alaska à la bordelaise or Colin d'Alaska?

Overall, Colin d'Alaska has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Colin d’Alaska à la bordelaise has fewer calories: 126 kcal versus 173 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Colin d'Alaska has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons