Coho Salmon Fillets vs Cooked Jumbo King Prawns
Overall, Coho Salmon Fillets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Coho Salmon Fillets | Cooked Jumbo King Prawns |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 221 kcal | 68 kcal |
| Fat | 16.1 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 1.6 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 20.5 g | 16.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Crustaceans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cooked Jumbo King Prawns has 69% fewer calories (68 kcal vs 221 kcal).
- Cooked Jumbo King Prawns has 98% less fat (0.4 g vs 16.1 g).
- Cooked Jumbo King Prawns has 97% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 3.1 g).
- Coho Salmon Fillets has 84% less salt (0.3 g vs 1.6 g).
- Coho Salmon Fillets has 21% more protein (20.5 g vs 16.2 g).
- Coho Salmon Fillets has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Coho Salmon Fillets lists: Fish.
- Only Cooked Jumbo King Prawns lists: Crustaceans.
Ingredients
Coho Salmon Fillets
COHO SALMON (ONCORHYNCHUS KISUTCH)
Cooked Jumbo King Prawns
Prawn (crustaceans), Salt.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Coho Salmon Fillets or Cooked Jumbo King Prawns?
Overall, Coho Salmon Fillets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cooked Jumbo King Prawns has fewer calories: 68 kcal versus 221 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Coho Salmon Fillets has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.