Coho Salmon Fillets vs Cocktail de fruits de mer surgelés
Overall, Cocktail de fruits de mer surgelés has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Coho Salmon Fillets
Cocktail de fruits de mer surgelés
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Coho Salmon Fillets | Cocktail de fruits de mer su... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 221 kcal | 81 kcal |
| Fat | 16.1 g | 1.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 20.5 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 0 | 4 |
| Allergens | Fish | E330, E331, E452, E500 |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cocktail de fruits de mer surgelés has 63% fewer calories (81 kcal vs 221 kcal).
- Cocktail de fruits de mer surgelés has 90% less fat (1.6 g vs 16.1 g).
- Cocktail de fruits de mer surgelés has 90% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 3.1 g).
- Coho Salmon Fillets has 69% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.8 g).
- Coho Salmon Fillets has 22% more protein (20.5 g vs 16 g).
- Only Coho Salmon Fillets lists: Fish.
- Only Cocktail de fruits de mer surgelés lists: E330, E331, E452, E500.
Ingredients
Coho Salmon Fillets
COHO SALMON (ONCORHYNCHUS KISUTCH)
Cocktail de fruits de mer surgelés
Kalmarringe 25% (KALMAR [gefangen im Südwestatlantik, Haken und Langleinen [Handleinen und Angelleinen [mechanisiert]]], Kochsalz, Stabilisator [E 452], Säuerungsmittel [E 330]), Riesenkalmarscheiben 25% (RIESENKALMAR [gefangen im Südostpazifik, Haken und Langleinen [Handleinen und Angelleinen [mechanisiert]]], Kochsalz, Säuerungsmittel [E 330], Säureregulatoren [E 331, E 500]), MIESMUSCHELN 25% (in Aquakultur gewonnen in Chile), Warmwassercrevetten 25% (CREVETTEN [in Aquakultur gewonnen in Ecuador [A], Vietnam [B], Indien [C], Herkunft siehe Datierungsfeld], Kochsalz).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Coho Salmon Fillets or Cocktail de fruits de mer surgelés?
Overall, Cocktail de fruits de mer surgelés has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cocktail de fruits de mer surgelés has fewer calories: 81 kcal versus 221 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Coho Salmon Fillets has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.