Comparison
Cod fillets vs Lachsfilet
Overall, Cod fillets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cod fillets | Lachsfilet |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 205 kcal | 211 kcal |
| Fat | 13 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 3 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 21.5 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cod fillets has 13% less fat (13 g vs 15 g).
- Cod fillets has 90% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 3 g).
- Cod fillets has 74% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0.1 g).
- Cod fillets has 12% more protein (21.5 g vs 19 g).
Ingredients
Cod fillets
Cod (Gadus monrhual)
Lachsfilet
Bio-Lachsfilet
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cod fillets or Lachsfilet?
Overall, Cod fillets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cod fillets has fewer calories: 205 kcal versus 211 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cod fillets has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.