Comparison
Lachsfilet vs Lachsforelle
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lachsfilet | Lachsforelle |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 211 kcal | 174 kcal |
| Fat | 15 g | 10 g |
| Saturated fat | 3 g | 1.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 3.2 g |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | — |
| Protein | 19 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lachsforelle has 18% fewer calories (174 kcal vs 211 kcal).
- Lachsforelle has 33% less fat (10 g vs 15 g).
- Lachsforelle has 43% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 3 g).
- Lachsforelle has no sugar, while Lachsfilet has 0.5 g.
- Lachsfilet has 97% less salt (0.1 g vs 3.2 g).
- Lachsfilet has the better Nutri-Score.
- Lachsfilet is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Lachsfilet lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Lachsfilet
Bio-Lachsfilet
Lachsforelle
Lachsforelle, Speisesalz, Säuerungsmittel: Natriumlactat; Buchenholzrauch.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lachsfilet or Lachsforelle?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lachsforelle has fewer calories: 174 kcal versus 211 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lachsforelle has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.