Comparison
Lachs geräuchert vs Lachsforelle
Overall, Lachsforelle has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lachs geräuchert | Lachsforelle |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 197 kcal | 174 kcal |
| Fat | 13 g | 10 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 1.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 3 g | 3.2 g |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | — |
| Protein | 20 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lachsforelle has 12% fewer calories (174 kcal vs 197 kcal).
- Lachsforelle has 23% less fat (10 g vs 13 g).
- Lachsforelle has 15% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 2 g).
- Lachs geräuchert is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Lachs geräuchert lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Lachs geräuchert
Lachsfilet, Salz, Buchenholzrauch
Lachsforelle
Lachsforelle, Speisesalz, Säuerungsmittel: Natriumlactat; Buchenholzrauch.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lachs geräuchert or Lachsforelle?
Overall, Lachsforelle has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lachsforelle has fewer calories: 174 kcal versus 197 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lachsforelle has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.