Comparison
Cod fillets vs Lachsforelle
Overall, Cod fillets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cod fillets | Lachsforelle |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 205 kcal | 174 kcal |
| Fat | 13 g | 10 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 1.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 3.2 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | — |
| Protein | 21.5 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lachsforelle has 15% fewer calories (174 kcal vs 205 kcal).
- Lachsforelle has 23% less fat (10 g vs 13 g).
- Cod fillets has 82% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 1.7 g).
- Lachsforelle has no sugar, while Cod fillets has 0.5 g.
- Cod fillets has 94% less salt (0.2 g vs 3.2 g).
- Cod fillets has the better Nutri-Score.
- Cod fillets is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Cod fillets lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Cod fillets
Cod (Gadus monrhual)
Lachsforelle
Lachsforelle, Speisesalz, Säuerungsmittel: Natriumlactat; Buchenholzrauch.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cod fillets or Lachsforelle?
Overall, Cod fillets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lachsforelle has fewer calories: 174 kcal versus 205 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lachsforelle has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.