Lachsforelle vs Filets de truite
Overall, Filets de truite has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lachsforelle | Filets de truite |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 174 kcal | 138 kcal |
| Fat | 10 g | 6 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.7 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 3.2 g | 2.3 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 21 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filets de truite has 21% fewer calories (138 kcal vs 174 kcal).
- Filets de truite has 40% less fat (6 g vs 10 g).
- Filets de truite has 53% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 1.7 g).
- Filets de truite has 27% less salt (2.3 g vs 3.2 g).
- Filets de truite is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Filets de truite lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Lachsforelle
Lachsforelle, Speisesalz, Säuerungsmittel: Natriumlactat; Buchenholzrauch.
Filets de truite
Regenbogenforelle (Oncorhynchus mykiss)*, Kochsalz. * Regenbogenforelle, Zucht, Dänemark.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lachsforelle or Filets de truite?
Overall, Filets de truite has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filets de truite has fewer calories: 138 kcal versus 174 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lachsforelle has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.