Century tuna (h) 155g vs Tuna Fillets in brine
Overall, Tuna Fillets in brine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Century tuna (h) 155g | Tuna Fillets in brine |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 196 kcal | 106 kcal |
| Fat | 12.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.3 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 12.5 g | 24.8 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tuna Fillets in brine has 46% fewer calories (106 kcal vs 196 kcal).
- Tuna Fillets in brine has 94% less fat (0.8 g vs 12.5 g).
- Tuna Fillets in brine has 95% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 6.3 g).
- Tuna Fillets in brine has 33% less salt (1.1 g vs 1.7 g).
- Tuna Fillets in brine has 50% more protein (24.8 g vs 12.5 g).
- Tuna Fillets in brine has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Century tuna (h) 155g lists: Fish, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Century tuna (h) 155g
Tuna Flakes, Water, Soya Oil, Soy Protein Concentrate, Iodized Salt, Sugar, Chili, Spices, Seasonings [MSG (Flavor Enhancer)], and Bay Leaf.
Tuna Fillets in brine
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Century tuna (h) 155g or Tuna Fillets in brine?
Overall, Tuna Fillets in brine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tuna Fillets in brine has fewer calories: 106 kcal versus 196 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Century tuna (h) 155g has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.