Comparison

Carpaccio di polpo vs Pota e Polvo em Azeite

Overall, Carpaccio di polpo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCarpaccio di polpoPota e Polvo em Azeite
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 126 kcal 165 kcal
Fat 5.5 g 8.6 g
Saturated fat 0.6 g 1.3 g
Sugars 0 g 0.5 g
Salt 1.4 g 0.9 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 18 g 22 g
Additives20
AllergensMolluscsMolluscs

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Carpaccio di polpo has 24% fewer calories (126 kcal vs 165 kcal).
  • Carpaccio di polpo has 36% less fat (5.5 g vs 8.6 g).
  • Carpaccio di polpo has 54% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Carpaccio di polpo has no sugar, while Pota e Polvo em Azeite has 0.5 g.
  • Pota e Polvo em Azeite has 36% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Pota e Polvo em Azeite has 18% more protein (22 g vs 18 g).
  • Pota e Polvo em Azeite is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Carpaccio di polpo

53% hobotnica, 46% suncokretovo ulje, vinski ocat, kuhinjska sol, sok od limuna, peršin, prírodne I arome, regulator kiselosti: natrijevi citrati; konzervans: kalijev sorbat. Može sadržavati tragove rakova, ribe, soje, jaja i glutena.

Pota e Polvo em Azeite

Pota(40%), Polvo(20%), Azeite(39%), Sal.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Carpaccio di polpo or Pota e Polvo em Azeite?

Overall, Carpaccio di polpo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Carpaccio di polpo has fewer calories: 126 kcal versus 165 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Carpaccio di polpo has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons