Carpaccio di polpo vs Lamelles de poulpe cuit
Overall, Lamelles de poulpe cuit has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Carpaccio di polpo | Lamelles de poulpe cuit |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 126 kcal | 72 kcal |
| Fat | 5.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 18 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Molluscs | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lamelles de poulpe cuit has 43% fewer calories (72 kcal vs 126 kcal).
- Lamelles de poulpe cuit has 87% less fat (0.7 g vs 5.5 g).
- Carpaccio di polpo has no sugar, while Lamelles de poulpe cuit has 0.6 g.
- Lamelles de poulpe cuit has 29% less salt (1 g vs 1.4 g).
- Carpaccio di polpo has 11% more protein (18 g vs 16 g).
- Only Carpaccio di polpo lists: Molluscs.
Ingredients
Carpaccio di polpo
53% hobotnica, 46% suncokretovo ulje, vinski ocat, kuhinjska sol, sok od limuna, peršin, prírodne I arome, regulator kiselosti: natrijevi citrati; konzervans: kalijev sorbat. Može sadržavati tragove rakova, ribe, soje, jaja i glutena.
Lamelles de poulpe cuit
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Carpaccio di polpo or Lamelles de poulpe cuit?
Overall, Lamelles de poulpe cuit has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lamelles de poulpe cuit has fewer calories: 72 kcal versus 126 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Carpaccio di polpo has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.