Comparison

Buchweizenflocken vs Buck Wheat Flakes

Overall, Buchweizenflocken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBuchweizenflockenBuck Wheat Flakes
Nutri-Score a c
NOVA group 1 4
Calories 364 kcal 377 kcal
Fat 2.7 g 1.7 g
Saturated fat 0.5 g 0.5 g
Sugars 0.5 g 8.3 g
Salt 0 g 1.2 g
Fiber 7 g 6 g
Protein 12 g 8.3 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Buck Wheat Flakes has 38% less fat (1.7 g vs 2.7 g).
  • Buchweizenflocken has 94% less sugar (0.5 g vs 8.3 g).
  • Buchweizenflocken has 99% less salt (0 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Buchweizenflocken has 14% more fiber (7 g vs 6 g).
  • Buchweizenflocken has 31% more protein (12 g vs 8.3 g).
  • Buchweizenflocken has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Buchweizenflocken is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Buchweizenflocken

Buchweizenflocken* *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft.

Buck Wheat Flakes

Organic Maize, Organic Buckwheat (30%), Organic Cane Sugar, Organic Maize Glucose, Sea Salt*, Organic Gluten Free Pure Oat Fibre. May contain traces of Soya. *Permitted non-organic ingredient € Certified Organic DK-OKO-100 EU/Non-EU Agriculture

FAQ

Which is healthier: Buchweizenflocken or Buck Wheat Flakes?

Overall, Buchweizenflocken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Buchweizenflocken has fewer calories: 364 kcal versus 377 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Buchweizenflocken has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 8.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons