Brotes de rúcula vs Bio maíz
Overall, Brotes de rúcula has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Brotes de rúcula | Bio maíz |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 30 kcal | 80 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 1.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 5.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 3.8 g |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 2.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Brotes de rúcula has 63% fewer calories (30 kcal vs 80 kcal).
- Brotes de rúcula has 74% less fat (0.5 g vs 1.9 g).
- Brotes de rúcula has 80% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Brotes de rúcula has 88% less sugar (0.6 g vs 5.2 g).
- Brotes de rúcula has 93% less salt (0 g vs 0.4 g).
- Bio maíz has 63% more fiber (3.8 g vs 1.4 g).
- Brotes de rúcula has 12% more protein (3.3 g vs 2.9 g).
- Brotes de rúcula is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Brotes de rúcula
Rúcula.
Bio maíz
Sweet corn in kernels (EU Agriculture)*, water, salt. * products from organic farming. Contains natural sugars
FAQ
Which is healthier: Brotes de rúcula or Bio maíz?
Overall, Brotes de rúcula has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Brotes de rúcula has fewer calories: 30 kcal versus 80 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Brotes de rúcula has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 5.2 g per 100 g.