Brotes de rúcula vs Sweet corn SRP 1/4 212x3
Overall, Brotes de rúcula has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Brotes de rúcula
Sweet corn SRP 1/4 212x3
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Brotes de rúcula | Sweet corn SRP 1/4 212x3 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 30 kcal | 80 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 1.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 5.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 3.8 g |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 2.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Brotes de rúcula has 63% fewer calories (30 kcal vs 80 kcal).
- Brotes de rúcula has 74% less fat (0.5 g vs 1.9 g).
- Brotes de rúcula has 80% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Brotes de rúcula has 88% less sugar (0.6 g vs 5.2 g).
- Brotes de rúcula has 93% less salt (0 g vs 0.4 g).
- Sweet corn SRP 1/4 212x3 has 63% more fiber (3.8 g vs 1.4 g).
- Brotes de rúcula has 12% more protein (3.3 g vs 2.9 g).
Ingredients
Brotes de rúcula
Rúcula.
Sweet corn SRP 1/4 212x3
Sweet corn in kernels, water, salt. Contains natural sugars. Regarding France (if labelling with logo GMO-free) : Sweet corn in kernels GMO-free (Genetically Modified Organism), water, salt. Contains natural sugars.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Brotes de rúcula or Sweet corn SRP 1/4 212x3?
Overall, Brotes de rúcula has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Brotes de rúcula has fewer calories: 30 kcal versus 80 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Brotes de rúcula has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 5.2 g per 100 g.