Bluberry Conserve vs Ratatouille
Overall, Ratatouille has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bluberry Conserve | Ratatouille |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 249 kcal | 33 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 55.4 g | 3.6 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 0.8 g | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 1.1 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ratatouille has 87% fewer calories (33 kcal vs 249 kcal).
- Bluberry Conserve has 67% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.6 g).
- Ratatouille has 94% less sugar (3.6 g vs 55.4 g).
- Bluberry Conserve has 84% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.8 g).
- Ratatouille has 56% more fiber (1.8 g vs 0.8 g).
- Ratatouille has 73% more protein (1.1 g vs 0.3 g).
- Ratatouille has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Bluberry Conserve
Sugar, Blueberries, Gelling Agent: Pectin, Acidity.
Ratatouille
Légumes mélangés 91 % en proportion variable (courgette, pulpe de tomates (tomate, purée de tomates, correcteur d'acidité (acide citrique)), aubergine, oignons, poivrons), sucre, double concentré de tomates, amidon modifié de maïs, sel, huile d'olive vierge 0,5 %, jus concentré de citron, ail, poivre et plantes aromatiques. Mode d'emploi: Se consomme froide ou chaude (réchauffer sans cuire à feu doux dans une casserole ou une poêle). Avant ouverture:
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bluberry Conserve or Ratatouille?
Overall, Ratatouille has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ratatouille has fewer calories: 33 kcal versus 249 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ratatouille has less sugar: 3.6 g versus 55.4 g per 100 g.