Comparison

Bluberry Conserve vs Carciofini interi

Overall, Carciofini interi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBluberry ConserveCarciofini interi
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 249 kcal 93 kcal
Fat 0.2 g 7.9 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 1.8 g
Sugars 55.4 g 0.7 g
Salt 0.1 g 2 g
Fiber 0.8 g 5.2 g
Protein 0.3 g 2.2 g
Additives10
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Carciofini interi has 63% fewer calories (93 kcal vs 249 kcal).
  • Bluberry Conserve has 97% less fat (0.2 g vs 7.9 g).
  • Bluberry Conserve has 94% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Carciofini interi has 99% less sugar (0.7 g vs 55.4 g).
  • Bluberry Conserve has 94% less salt (0.1 g vs 2 g).
  • Carciofini interi has 85% more fiber (5.2 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Carciofini interi has 86% more protein (2.2 g vs 0.3 g).
  • Carciofini interi has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Carciofini interi is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Bluberry Conserve

Sugar, Blueberries, Gelling Agent: Pectin, Acidity.

Carciofini interi

Carciofini 55%, olio di semi di girasole, aceto di vino, sale.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bluberry Conserve or Carciofini interi?

Overall, Carciofini interi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Carciofini interi has fewer calories: 93 kcal versus 249 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Carciofini interi has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 55.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons