Comparison
Backmalz vs Knäckebrot Roggen
Overall, Backmalz has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Backmalz | Knäckebrot Roggen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 371 kcal | 344 kcal |
| Fat | 2.6 g | 2.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 2.4 g | 2.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 15.1 g | 14.1 g |
| Protein | 10.5 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Backmalz has 55% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1.1 g).
- Backmalz has 11% less sugar (2.4 g vs 2.7 g).
- Backmalz has 99% less salt (0 g vs 1.2 g).
- Backmalz has the better Nutri-Score.
- Backmalz is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Backmalz
Roggen
Knäckebrot Roggen
Vollkornroggenmehl (92%), Wasser, Hefe, Salz, Emulgator (E471). Kann Sesam und Weizen enthalten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Backmalz or Knäckebrot Roggen?
Overall, Backmalz has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Knäckebrot Roggen has fewer calories: 344 kcal versus 371 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Backmalz has less sugar: 2.4 g versus 2.7 g per 100 g.