Comparison
Backmalz vs Centeno hinchado
Overall, Backmalz has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Backmalz | Centeno hinchado |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 371 kcal | 339 kcal |
| Fat | 2.6 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 2.4 g | 1.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 15.1 g | — |
| Protein | 10.5 g | 9.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Centeno hinchado has 42% less fat (1.5 g vs 2.6 g).
- Centeno hinchado has 54% less sugar (1.1 g vs 2.4 g).
- Backmalz has 12% more protein (10.5 g vs 9.2 g).
- Backmalz has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Backmalz lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Backmalz
Roggen
Centeno hinchado
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Backmalz or Centeno hinchado?
Overall, Backmalz has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Centeno hinchado has fewer calories: 339 kcal versus 371 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Centeno hinchado has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 2.4 g per 100 g.