Comparison
Backmalz vs Matvete
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Backmalz | Matvete |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 371 kcal | 350 kcal |
| Fat | 2.6 g | 2.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 2.4 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 15.1 g | 12 g |
| Protein | 10.5 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Matvete has 71% less sugar (0.7 g vs 2.4 g).
- Backmalz has 21% more fiber (15.1 g vs 12 g).
Ingredients
Backmalz
Roggen
Matvete
Vete* *Svenskodlat, ångpreparerat och valsat. 100% fullkorn. KRAV-ekologisk ingrediens. SE-EKO-01. Kan innehålla enstaka kärnor av havre, råg och korn.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Backmalz or Matvete?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Matvete has fewer calories: 350 kcal versus 371 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Matvete has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 2.4 g per 100 g.