Bio Roggen vs Matvete
Overall, Bio Roggen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bio Roggen | Matvete |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 323 kcal | 350 kcal |
| Fat | 1.7 g | 2.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 13 g | 12 g |
| Protein | 9.5 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bio Roggen has 35% less fat (1.7 g vs 2.6 g).
- Bio Roggen has 50% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 0.6 g).
Ingredients
Bio Roggen
roggen
Matvete
Vete* *Svenskodlat, ångpreparerat och valsat. 100% fullkorn. KRAV-ekologisk ingrediens. SE-EKO-01. Kan innehålla enstaka kärnor av havre, råg och korn.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bio Roggen or Matvete?
Overall, Bio Roggen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bio Roggen has fewer calories: 323 kcal versus 350 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Matvete has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.