Comparison
Backmalz vs Bio Roggen
Overall, Bio Roggen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Backmalz | Bio Roggen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 371 kcal | 323 kcal |
| Fat | 2.6 g | 1.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 2.4 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 15.1 g | 13 g |
| Protein | 10.5 g | 9.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bio Roggen has 13% fewer calories (323 kcal vs 371 kcal).
- Bio Roggen has 35% less fat (1.7 g vs 2.6 g).
- Bio Roggen has 63% less sugar (0.9 g vs 2.4 g).
- Backmalz has 14% more fiber (15.1 g vs 13 g).
Ingredients
Backmalz
Roggen
Bio Roggen
roggen
FAQ
Which is healthier: Backmalz or Bio Roggen?
Overall, Bio Roggen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bio Roggen has fewer calories: 323 kcal versus 371 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bio Roggen has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 2.4 g per 100 g.