View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Prosciutto di alce
Prosciutto di alce by Bernardini Gastone provides 143 kcal per 100 g, with 0 g of sugars and 33 g of protein. That is 100% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is D and it is classified as NOVA 4 (ultra-processed food). It is listed in the Hams category and comes in a 70 g pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 143 kcal | 169 −15% |
| Total fat | 1.1 g | 8.1 −86% |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 3 −100% |
| Carbohydrates | 0 g | 1.5 −100% |
| Total sugars | 0 g | 0.8 −100% |
| Added sugars | 0 g | 1.9 −100% |
| Protein | 33 g | 22.4 +47% |
| Salt | 2.8 g | 3.1 −9% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 1900 Hams products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other hams
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Carne di alce, sale, spezie, aromi, E250.
Additives 1
Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.
Product details
- Quantity
- 70 g
- Labels & certifications
- Low or no fatLow fatNo gluten
- Sold in
- Italy
- Barcode
- 8032649650980
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Recipe & label changes
-
September 26, 2026
- Name: Prosciutto di Alce → Prosciutto di alce
- Pack size: — → 70 g
- Nutri-Score: — → d
- NOVA group: — → 4
Changes to this product's label data recorded since Foodmetria started tracking it.
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Prosciutto di alce?
Prosciutto di alce contains 143 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Prosciutto di alce?
Prosciutto di alce has 0 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Prosciutto di alce healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of D (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 4 — ultra-processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated September 26, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
More hams
View all →
d NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
d NOVA 3 
d NOVA 4 
b NOVA 4 