View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Kokt Julskinka
Kokt Julskinka med svål
Kokt Julskinka by Axfood provides 190 kcal per 100 g, with 2 g of sugars and 21 g of protein. That is 138% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is D and it is classified as NOVA 4 (ultra-processed food). It is listed in the Hams category and comes in a 2.282 kg pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 190 kcal | 169 +12% |
| Total fat | 11 g | 8.1 +35% |
| Saturated fat | 4.6 g | 3 +52% |
| Carbohydrates | 2 g | 1.5 +33% |
| Total sugars | 2 g | 0.8 +138% |
| Added sugars | 1.5 g | 1.9 −22% |
| Dietary fiber | 0 g | 0.3 −100% |
| Protein | 21 g | 22.4 −6% |
| Salt | 2.3 g | 3.1 −25% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 1893 Hams products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other hams
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Skinka (92%), salt, druvsocker, antioxidationsmedel (E301, E331), konserveringsmedel (E250).
Additives 3
Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.
Product details
- Quantity
- 2.282 kg
- Labels & certifications
- Kött från sverige
- Sold in
- Sweden
- Barcode
- 2359761722828
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Kokt Julskinka?
Kokt Julskinka contains 190 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Kokt Julskinka?
Kokt Julskinka has 2 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Kokt Julskinka healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of D (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 4 — ultra-processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Is Kokt Julskinka vegan?
Based on its ingredient list, it is not vegan.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated April 2, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
a 
b NOVA 3 
a 
b NOVA 3 More hams
View all →
d NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
d NOVA 3 
d NOVA 4 
b NOVA 4 More from Axfood
View all →
e NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 
a 
b NOVA 1 
c NOVA 4