View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Flak av spekeskinke
Flak av spekeskinke by Stranda provides 239 kcal per 100 g, with 0 g of sugars and 28 g of protein. That is 100% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E and it is classified as NOVA 3 (processed food). It is listed in the Hams category and comes in a 150g pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 239 kcal | 169 +41% |
| Total fat | 14 g | 8.1 +72% |
| Saturated fat | 5 g | 3 +65% |
| Carbohydrates | 0 g | 1.5 −100% |
| Total sugars | 0 g | 0.8 −100% |
| Protein | 28 g | 22.4 +25% |
| Salt | 7.5 g | 3.1 +143% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 1893 Hams products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other hams
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Til 100g vare er anvendt 145 g renskåret svinekjøtt, salt (med konserveringsmiddel E250), antioksidant E 301.
Additives 1
Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.
Product details
- Quantity
- 150g
- Labels & certifications
- Green Dot
- Sold in
- Norway
- Barcode
- 7058040661401
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Flak av spekeskinke?
Flak av spekeskinke contains 239 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Flak av spekeskinke?
Flak av spekeskinke has 0 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Flak av spekeskinke healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 3 — processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated November 16, 2025. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
a
c NOVA 3
d
d More hams
View all →
d NOVA 4
d NOVA 4
e NOVA 4
d NOVA 3
d NOVA 4
b NOVA 4 More from Stranda
View all →
e NOVA 3
e NOVA 4
e NOVA 3
e