View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Burgunderskinke
Burgunderskinke by Minimum provides 116 kcal per 100 g, with 0.7 g of sugars and 19 g of protein. That is 17% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is D and it is classified as NOVA 4 (ultra-processed food). It is listed in the Hams category and comes in a 125g pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 116 kcal | 169 −31% |
| Total fat | 4 g | 8.1 −51% |
| Saturated fat | 1.5 g | 3 −51% |
| Carbohydrates | 1 g | 1.5 −34% |
| Total sugars | 0.7 g | 0.8 −17% |
| Protein | 19 g | 22.4 −15% |
| Salt | 2.5 g | 3.1 −19% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 1893 Hams products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other hams
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
92% skinkekød, vand, salt, dextrose, glukosesirup, stabilisator (E 450), antioxidant (E 301), peberekstrakt, hvidløgsekstrakt, konserveringsmiddel (E 250).
Additives 3
Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.
Product details
- Quantity
- 125g
- Labels & certifications
- Keyhole
- Sold in
- Denmark
- Barcode
- 5712871102329
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Burgunderskinke?
Burgunderskinke contains 116 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Burgunderskinke?
Burgunderskinke has 0.7 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Burgunderskinke healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of D (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 4 — ultra-processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated September 26, 2021. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
b NOVA 3 
a 
a 
c NOVA 3 More hams
View all →
d NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
d NOVA 3 
d NOVA 4 
b NOVA 4 More from Minimum
View all →
c NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4 
NOVA 4