Comparison
Wild Pacific Red Salmon vs Salmón al natural
Overall, Wild Pacific Red Salmon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Wild Pacific Red Salmon | Salmón al natural |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 151 kcal | 143 kcal |
| Fat | 7.8 g | 7.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.6 g | 1.4 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 20.4 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wild Pacific Red Salmon has no sugar, while Salmón al natural has 0.5 g.
- Wild Pacific Red Salmon has 17% more protein (20.4 g vs 17 g).
- Wild Pacific Red Salmon has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Wild Pacific Red Salmon
red salmon 99 %, salt.
Salmón al natural
Salmón, agua, sal.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Wild Pacific Red Salmon or Salmón al natural?
Overall, Wild Pacific Red Salmon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Salmón al natural has fewer calories: 143 kcal versus 151 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Wild Pacific Red Salmon has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Saumon au naturel vs Salmón al natural
Saumon au naturel vs Wild Pacific Red Salmon
Saumon Atlantique au Nat... vs Wild Pacific Red Salmon
Crème de saumon rose du... vs Wild Pacific Red Salmon
Saumon sauvage au nature... vs Wild Pacific Red Salmon
Saumon au naturel sans p... vs Wild Pacific Red Salmon
Saumon au naturel vs Wild Pacific Red Salmon
Saumon au naturel vs Salmón al natural