Saumon au naturel sans peau et sans arête boîte de 1/5, 112g vs Wild Pacific Red Salmon
Overall, Wild Pacific Red Salmon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Saumon au naturel sans peau et sans arête boîte de 1/5, 112g
Wild Pacific Red Salmon
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Saumon au naturel sans peau... | Wild Pacific Red Salmon |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 173 kcal | 151 kcal |
| Fat | 9.4 g | 7.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.6 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 22 g | 20.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wild Pacific Red Salmon has 13% fewer calories (151 kcal vs 173 kcal).
- Wild Pacific Red Salmon has 17% less fat (7.8 g vs 9.4 g).
- Wild Pacific Red Salmon has no sugar, while Saumon au naturel sans peau et sans arête boîte de 1/5, 112g has 0.5 g.
Ingredients
Saumon au naturel sans peau et sans arête boîte de 1/5, 112g
SAUMON Atlantique (salmo salar), eau, sel
Wild Pacific Red Salmon
red salmon 99 %, salt.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Saumon au naturel sans peau et sans arête boîte de 1/5, 112g or Wild Pacific Red Salmon?
Overall, Wild Pacific Red Salmon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Wild Pacific Red Salmon has fewer calories: 151 kcal versus 173 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Wild Pacific Red Salmon has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.