Comparison

Saumon au naturel sans peau et sans arête boîte de 1/5, 112g vs Wild Pacific Red Salmon

Overall, Wild Pacific Red Salmon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSaumon au naturel sans peau...Wild Pacific Red Salmon
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 173 kcal 151 kcal
Fat 9.4 g 7.8 g
Saturated fat 1.6 g 1.6 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0 g
Salt 0.9 g 0.9 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 22 g 20.4 g
Additives00
AllergensFishFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Wild Pacific Red Salmon has 13% fewer calories (151 kcal vs 173 kcal).
  • Wild Pacific Red Salmon has 17% less fat (7.8 g vs 9.4 g).
  • Wild Pacific Red Salmon has no sugar, while Saumon au naturel sans peau et sans arête boîte de 1/5, 112g has 0.5 g.

Ingredients

Saumon au naturel sans peau et sans arête boîte de 1/5, 112g

SAUMON Atlantique (salmo salar), eau, sel

Wild Pacific Red Salmon

red salmon 99 %, salt.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Saumon au naturel sans peau et sans arête boîte de 1/5, 112g or Wild Pacific Red Salmon?

Overall, Wild Pacific Red Salmon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Wild Pacific Red Salmon has fewer calories: 151 kcal versus 173 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Wild Pacific Red Salmon has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons