Saumon Atlantique au Naturel sans Peau sans arêtes vs Wild Pacific Red Salmon
Overall, Wild Pacific Red Salmon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Saumon Atlantique au Naturel sans Peau sans arêtes
Wild Pacific Red Salmon
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Saumon Atlantique au Naturel... | Wild Pacific Red Salmon |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 168 kcal | 151 kcal |
| Fat | 8.9 g | 7.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.5 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 22 g | 20.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Saumon Atlantique | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wild Pacific Red Salmon has 10% fewer calories (151 kcal vs 168 kcal).
- Wild Pacific Red Salmon has 12% less fat (7.8 g vs 8.9 g).
- Only Saumon Atlantique au Naturel sans Peau sans arêtes lists: Saumon Atlantique.
Ingredients
Saumon Atlantique au Naturel sans Peau sans arêtes
_Saumon Atlantique_, eau, sel.
Wild Pacific Red Salmon
red salmon 99 %, salt.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Saumon Atlantique au Naturel sans Peau sans arêtes or Wild Pacific Red Salmon?
Overall, Wild Pacific Red Salmon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Wild Pacific Red Salmon has fewer calories: 151 kcal versus 168 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Saumon Atlantique au Naturel sans Peau sans arêtes has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.