Comparison

Saumon au naturel vs Wild Pacific Red Salmon

Overall, Wild Pacific Red Salmon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Saumon au naturel

Parallèles · 190 g (125 g égoutté)

b NOVA 3

Better choice

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Saumon au naturel	Wild Pacific Red Salmon
Nutri-Score	b	a
NOVA group	3	3
Calories	181 kcal	151 kcal
Fat	11 g	7.8 g
Saturated fat	1.9 g	1.6 g
Sugars	0 g	0 g
Salt	1.3 g	0.9 g
Fiber	0.1 g	—
Protein	21 g	20.4 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	Fish	Fish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Wild Pacific Red Salmon has 17% fewer calories (151 kcal vs 181 kcal).
Wild Pacific Red Salmon has 29% less fat (7.8 g vs 11 g).
Wild Pacific Red Salmon has 31% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.3 g).
Wild Pacific Red Salmon has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Saumon au naturel

_Saumon_ (saImo saIar) 76,3%, eau, sel

Wild Pacific Red Salmon

red salmon 99 %, salt.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Saumon au naturel or Wild Pacific Red Salmon?

Overall, Wild Pacific Red Salmon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Wild Pacific Red Salmon has fewer calories: 151 kcal versus 181 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Saumon au naturel has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Saumon Atlantique au Nat... vs Saumon au naturel Saumon au naturel vs Salmón al natural Saumon au naturel vs Wild Pacific Red Salmon Saumon au naturel vs Saumon au naturel Saumon Atlantique au Nat... vs Wild Pacific Red Salmon Crème de saumon rose du... vs Wild Pacific Red Salmon Saumon sauvage au nature... vs Wild Pacific Red Salmon Saumon au naturel sans p... vs Wild Pacific Red Salmon