Saumon au naturel vs Wild Pacific Red Salmon
Overall, Wild Pacific Red Salmon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Saumon au naturel | Wild Pacific Red Salmon |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 191 kcal | 151 kcal |
| Fat | 11 g | 7.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 23 g | 20.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wild Pacific Red Salmon has 21% fewer calories (151 kcal vs 191 kcal).
- Wild Pacific Red Salmon has 29% less fat (7.8 g vs 11 g).
- Wild Pacific Red Salmon has 20% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 2 g).
- Saumon au naturel has 11% more protein (23 g vs 20.4 g).
- Wild Pacific Red Salmon has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Saumon au naturel
_Saumon_ 65,8% (Salmo salar), eau, sel. Ce saumon Carrefour a été élevé en Norvège ou aux Iles Féroé.
Wild Pacific Red Salmon
red salmon 99 %, salt.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Saumon au naturel or Wild Pacific Red Salmon?
Overall, Wild Pacific Red Salmon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Wild Pacific Red Salmon has fewer calories: 151 kcal versus 191 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Saumon au naturel has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.