Comparison

Saumon sauvage au naturel vs Wild Pacific Red Salmon

Overall, Saumon sauvage au naturel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Better choice

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Saumon sauvage au naturel	Wild Pacific Red Salmon
Nutri-Score	a	a
NOVA group	3	3
Calories	109 kcal	151 kcal
Fat	1.9 g	7.8 g
Saturated fat	0.6 g	1.6 g
Sugars	0 g	0 g
Salt	1 g	0.9 g
Fiber	0 g	—
Protein	23 g	20.4 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	Fish	Fish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Saumon sauvage au naturel has 28% fewer calories (109 kcal vs 151 kcal).
Saumon sauvage au naturel has 76% less fat (1.9 g vs 7.8 g).
Saumon sauvage au naturel has 63% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 1.6 g).
Saumon sauvage au naturel has 11% more protein (23 g vs 20.4 g).

Ingredients

Saumon sauvage au naturel

_Saumon_ rose du Pacifique, eau, sel

Wild Pacific Red Salmon

red salmon 99 %, salt.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Saumon sauvage au naturel or Wild Pacific Red Salmon?

Overall, Saumon sauvage au naturel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Saumon sauvage au naturel has fewer calories: 109 kcal versus 151 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Saumon sauvage au naturel has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Saumon sauvage au nature... vs Crème de saumon rose du... Saumon au naturel vs Wild Pacific Red Salmon Saumon sauvage au nature... vs Saumon au naturel Saumon Atlantique au Nat... vs Wild Pacific Red Salmon Crème de saumon rose du... vs Wild Pacific Red Salmon Saumon au naturel sans p... vs Wild Pacific Red Salmon Saumon au naturel vs Wild Pacific Red Salmon Saumon Atlantique au Nat... vs Saumon sauvage au nature...