White fish fillets vs Filet de colin d’alaska pané
Overall, White fish fillets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | White fish fillets | Filet de colin d’alaska pané |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 83 kcal | 211 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 8.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 0.8 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | — |
| Protein | 18.9 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- White fish fillets has 61% fewer calories (83 kcal vs 211 kcal).
- White fish fillets has no fat, while Filet de colin d’alaska pané has 8.9 g.
- White fish fillets has no saturated fat, while Filet de colin d’alaska pané has 0.8 g.
- White fish fillets has 36% more protein (18.9 g vs 12 g).
- Only White fish fillets lists: Fish.
Ingredients
White fish fillets
Alaska Pollock (Theragra chalcogramma) (_Fish_).
Filet de colin d’alaska pané
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: White fish fillets or Filet de colin d’alaska pané?
Overall, White fish fillets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
White fish fillets has fewer calories: 83 kcal versus 211 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
White fish fillets has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.