Comparison

White fish fillets vs Filet de colin d’alaska pané

Overall, White fish fillets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientWhite fish filletsFilet de colin d’alaska pané
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 83 kcal 211 kcal
Fat 0 g 8.9 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.8 g
Sugars 0.7 g 0.8 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.5 g
Fiber 0.1 g —
Protein 18.9 g 12 g
Additives00
AllergensFishNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • White fish fillets has 61% fewer calories (83 kcal vs 211 kcal).
  • White fish fillets has no fat, while Filet de colin d’alaska pané has 8.9 g.
  • White fish fillets has no saturated fat, while Filet de colin d’alaska pané has 0.8 g.
  • White fish fillets has 36% more protein (18.9 g vs 12 g).
  • Only White fish fillets lists: Fish.

Ingredients

White fish fillets

Alaska Pollock (Theragra chalcogramma) (_Fish_).

Filet de colin d’alaska pané

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: White fish fillets or Filet de colin d’alaska pané?

Overall, White fish fillets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

White fish fillets has fewer calories: 83 kcal versus 211 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

White fish fillets has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons