Comparison

Filet de colin d’alaska pané vs Dos de colin d'Alaska

Overall, Dos de colin d'Alaska has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFilet de colin d’alaska panéDos de colin d'Alaska
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group — 1
Calories 211 kcal 69 kcal
Fat 8.9 g 1 g
Saturated fat 0.8 g 0 g
Sugars 0.8 g 0 g
Salt 0.5 g 0.1 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 12 g 15 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Dos de colin d'Alaska has 67% fewer calories (69 kcal vs 211 kcal).
  • Dos de colin d'Alaska has 89% less fat (1 g vs 8.9 g).
  • Dos de colin d'Alaska has no saturated fat, while Filet de colin d’alaska pané has 0.8 g.
  • Dos de colin d'Alaska has no sugar, while Filet de colin d’alaska pané has 0.8 g.
  • Dos de colin d'Alaska has 78% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Dos de colin d'Alaska has 20% more protein (15 g vs 12 g).
  • Only Dos de colin d'Alaska lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Filet de colin d’alaska pané

Not available.

Dos de colin d'Alaska

Colin d'Alaska (Gadus Chalcogramus - Poisson)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filet de colin d’alaska pané or Dos de colin d'Alaska?

Overall, Dos de colin d'Alaska has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Dos de colin d'Alaska has fewer calories: 69 kcal versus 211 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Dos de colin d'Alaska has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons