Filet de colin d’alaska pané vs Dos de Colin d'Alaska surgelés
Overall, Dos de Colin d'Alaska surgelés has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet de colin d’alaska pané | Dos de Colin d'Alaska surgel... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 211 kcal | 70 kcal |
| Fat | 8.9 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Dos de Colin d'Alaska surgelés has 67% fewer calories (70 kcal vs 211 kcal).
- Dos de Colin d'Alaska surgelés has 98% less fat (0.2 g vs 8.9 g).
- Dos de Colin d'Alaska surgelés has no saturated fat, while Filet de colin d’alaska pané has 0.8 g.
- Dos de Colin d'Alaska surgelés has no sugar, while Filet de colin d’alaska pané has 0.8 g.
- Dos de Colin d'Alaska surgelés has 29% more protein (17 g vs 12 g).
- Only Dos de Colin d'Alaska surgelés lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Filet de colin d’alaska pané
Not available.
Dos de Colin d'Alaska surgelés
_Colin_ d'Alaska (Espèce : Theragra chalcogramma)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet de colin d’alaska pané or Dos de Colin d'Alaska surgelés?
Overall, Dos de Colin d'Alaska surgelés has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Dos de Colin d'Alaska surgelés has fewer calories: 70 kcal versus 211 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Dos de Colin d'Alaska surgelés has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.