Filet de colin d’alaska pané vs 8 panés Colin d'Alaska
Overall, Filet de colin d’alaska pané has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet de colin d’alaska pané | 8 panés Colin d'Alaska |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 211 kcal | 179 kcal |
| Fat | 8.9 g | 6.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 2.7 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.6 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- 8 panés Colin d'Alaska has 15% fewer calories (179 kcal vs 211 kcal).
- 8 panés Colin d'Alaska has 22% less fat (6.9 g vs 8.9 g).
- Filet de colin d’alaska pané has 70% less sugar (0.8 g vs 2.7 g).
- Filet de colin d’alaska pané has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only 8 panés Colin d'Alaska lists: Fish, Gluten.
Ingredients
Filet de colin d’alaska pané
Not available.
8 panés Colin d'Alaska
Filets de _colin d'Alaska_ MSC 65% (Theragra chalcogramma pêché aux chaluts en Océan Pacifique Nord-Ouest et Nord-Est), farine de _blé_, huile de colza, amidon de _blé_, sel, levure, eau. Peut contenir des traces de graines de sésame.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet de colin d’alaska pané or 8 panés Colin d'Alaska?
Overall, Filet de colin d’alaska pané has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
8 panés Colin d'Alaska has fewer calories: 179 kcal versus 211 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filet de colin d’alaska pané has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 2.7 g per 100 g.