Comparison

White fish fillets vs Dos de colin d'Alaska

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	White fish fillets	Dos de colin d'Alaska
Nutri-Score	a	a
NOVA group	1	1
Calories	83 kcal	69 kcal
Fat	0 g	1 g
Saturated fat	0 g	0 g
Sugars	0.7 g	0 g
Salt	0.2 g	0.1 g
Fiber	0.1 g	0 g
Protein	18.9 g	15 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	Fish	Fish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Dos de colin d'Alaska has 17% fewer calories (69 kcal vs 83 kcal).
White fish fillets has no fat, while Dos de colin d'Alaska has 1 g.
Dos de colin d'Alaska has no sugar, while White fish fillets has 0.7 g.
White fish fillets has 20% more protein (18.9 g vs 15 g).

Ingredients

White fish fillets

Alaska Pollock (Theragra chalcogramma) (_Fish_).

Dos de colin d'Alaska

Colin d'Alaska (Gadus Chalcogramus - Poisson)

FAQ

Which is healthier: White fish fillets or Dos de colin d'Alaska?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Dos de colin d'Alaska has fewer calories: 69 kcal versus 83 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Dos de colin d'Alaska has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

8 panés Colin d'Alaska vs Dos de colin d'Alaska White fish fillets vs 8 panés Colin d'Alaska Colin d'Alaksa sauce beu... vs Dos de colin d'Alaska White fish fillets vs Colin d'Alaksa sauce beu... Filet de colin d’alaska... vs Dos de colin d'Alaska Colin d'Alaska 100 % fil... vs Dos de colin d'Alaska Colin D'alaska Sauce Beu... vs Dos de colin d'Alaska Dos de colin d'Alaska vs Dos de Colin d'Alaska su...