White fish fillets vs Dos de Colin d'Alaska surgelés
Overall, Dos de Colin d'Alaska surgelés has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
White fish fillets
Dos de Colin d'Alaska surgelés
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | White fish fillets | Dos de Colin d'Alaska surgel... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 83 kcal | 70 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 18.9 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Dos de Colin d'Alaska surgelés has 16% fewer calories (70 kcal vs 83 kcal).
- Dos de Colin d'Alaska surgelés has no sugar, while White fish fillets has 0.7 g.
Ingredients
White fish fillets
Alaska Pollock (Theragra chalcogramma) (_Fish_).
Dos de Colin d'Alaska surgelés
_Colin_ d'Alaska (Espèce : Theragra chalcogramma)
FAQ
Which is healthier: White fish fillets or Dos de Colin d'Alaska surgelés?
Overall, Dos de Colin d'Alaska surgelés has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Dos de Colin d'Alaska surgelés has fewer calories: 70 kcal versus 83 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Dos de Colin d'Alaska surgelés has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.