Wasa delicate crisp rosemary 190g we vs Mini Crackers zout
Overall, Mini Crackers zout has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Wasa delicate crisp rosemary... | Mini Crackers zout |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 396 kcal | 427 kcal |
| Fat | 8 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 5.7 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 1.6 g |
| Salt | 2.5 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 10 g | 3.4 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wasa delicate crisp rosemary 190g we has 33% less fat (8 g vs 12 g).
- Wasa delicate crisp rosemary 190g we has 88% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 5.7 g).
- Mini Crackers zout has 47% less sugar (1.6 g vs 3 g).
- Mini Crackers zout has 100% less salt (0 g vs 2.5 g).
- Wasa delicate crisp rosemary 190g we has 66% more fiber (10 g vs 3.4 g).
- Mini Crackers zout has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Wasa delicate crisp rosemary 190g we
Farine complète de BLÉ 47%, farine de BLÉ 41%, huile de tournesol, romarin 1,7%, sel, sel de mer 1,0%, extrait de malt d'ORGE, levure, antioxydant : extraits de romarin. Peut contenir des traces de LUPIN, LAIT, MOUTARDE, GRAINES DE SÉSAME et SOJA.
Mini Crackers zout
TARWEBLOEM 97 %, palmolie, zout 2,1 %, zonnebloemolie, zuurteregelaar (natriumcarbonaten), GERSTEMOUTMEEL, gist
FAQ
Which is healthier: Wasa delicate crisp rosemary 190g we or Mini Crackers zout?
Overall, Mini Crackers zout has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Wasa delicate crisp rosemary 190g we has fewer calories: 396 kcal versus 427 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mini Crackers zout has less sugar: 1.6 g versus 3 g per 100 g.