Wasa delicate crisp rosemary 190g we vs Luchtige Crackers
Overall, Luchtige Crackers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Wasa delicate crisp rosemary 190g we
Luchtige Crackers
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Wasa delicate crisp rosemary... | Luchtige Crackers |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 396 kcal | 380 kcal |
| Fat | 8 g | 3.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 5 g |
| Salt | 2.5 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 10 g | — |
| Protein | 11 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Luchtige Crackers has 56% less fat (3.5 g vs 8 g).
- Wasa delicate crisp rosemary 190g we has 40% less sugar (3 g vs 5 g).
- Luchtige Crackers has 52% less salt (1.2 g vs 2.5 g).
- Luchtige Crackers has 15% more protein (13 g vs 11 g).
- Luchtige Crackers has the better Nutri-Score.
- Wasa delicate crisp rosemary 190g we is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Luchtige Crackers lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Wasa delicate crisp rosemary 190g we
Farine complète de BLÉ 47%, farine de BLÉ 41%, huile de tournesol, romarin 1,7%, sel, sel de mer 1,0%, extrait de malt d'ORGE, levure, antioxydant : extraits de romarin. Peut contenir des traces de LUPIN, LAIT, MOUTARDE, GRAINES DE SÉSAME et SOJA.
Luchtige Crackers
tarwebloem, weipoeder, suiker, zonnebloemolie, zout
FAQ
Which is healthier: Wasa delicate crisp rosemary 190g we or Luchtige Crackers?
Overall, Luchtige Crackers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Luchtige Crackers has fewer calories: 380 kcal versus 396 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Wasa delicate crisp rosemary 190g we has less sugar: 3 g versus 5 g per 100 g.