Wafer thin cooked ham slices vs Italian inspired Sicilian ham
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Wafer thin cooked ham slices | Italian inspired Sicilian ha... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 110 kcal | 115 kcal |
| Fat | 3.4 g | 2.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 1.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 1.1 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 1.6 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 18.5 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 2 | 3 |
| Allergens | Pork | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Italian inspired Sicilian ham has 18% less fat (2.8 g vs 3.4 g).
- Wafer thin cooked ham slices has 27% less sugar (0.8 g vs 1.1 g).
- Wafer thin cooked ham slices has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Italian inspired Sicilian ham has 12% more protein (21 g vs 18.5 g).
- Only Wafer thin cooked ham slices lists: Pork.
Ingredients
Wafer thin cooked ham slices
pork, salt, sugar, triphosphates, sodium ascorbate, sodium nitrate
Italian inspired Sicilian ham
Sertéshús 95 %, jódozott étkezési só (étkezési só, kálium-jodát), zöldfűszerkivonatok, glükózszirup, szárított paradicsom, dextróz, cukor, stabilizátor: trifoszfátok, antioxidáns: nátrium-aszkorbát, tartósítószer: nátrium-nitrit.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Wafer thin cooked ham slices or Italian inspired Sicilian ham?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Wafer thin cooked ham slices has fewer calories: 110 kcal versus 115 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Wafer thin cooked ham slices has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.