Comparison
Tuna Steak vs Petits poissons frits
Overall, Tuna Steak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tuna Steak | Petits poissons frits |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 158 kcal | 231 kcal |
| Fat | 6.4 g | 17 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 25 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tuna Steak has 32% fewer calories (158 kcal vs 231 kcal).
- Tuna Steak has 62% less fat (6.4 g vs 17 g).
- Tuna Steak has 60% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 2 g).
- Tuna Steak has no sugar, while Petits poissons frits has 0.5 g.
- Tuna Steak has 53% less salt (0.9 g vs 2 g).
- Tuna Steak has 48% more protein (25 g vs 13 g).
- Tuna Steak has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Petits poissons frits lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Tuna Steak
Skipjack Tuna 93%, Sunflower Oil, Salt
Petits poissons frits
Athérine (Atherina boyeri), huile de tournesol, farine de BLE, sel. Conservateur : E202.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tuna Steak or Petits poissons frits?
Overall, Tuna Steak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tuna Steak has fewer calories: 158 kcal versus 231 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tuna Steak has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.