Comparison
Tuna Fillets in brine vs Trancetti di tonno
Overall, Tuna Fillets in brine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tuna Fillets in brine | Trancetti di tonno |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 106 kcal | 231 kcal |
| Fat | 0.8 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 1.8 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 24.8 g | 24 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tuna Fillets in brine has 54% fewer calories (106 kcal vs 231 kcal).
- Tuna Fillets in brine has 95% less fat (0.8 g vs 15 g).
- Tuna Fillets in brine has 85% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 2 g).
- Tuna Fillets in brine has 39% less salt (1.1 g vs 1.8 g).
- Tuna Fillets in brine has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Tuna Fillets in brine
Not available.
Trancetti di tonno
95% tonnetto striato, 3% olio di oliva, 2% sale
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tuna Fillets in brine or Trancetti di tonno?
Overall, Tuna Fillets in brine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tuna Fillets in brine has fewer calories: 106 kcal versus 231 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tuna Fillets in brine has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Posta de atum dos Açores vs Trancetti di tonno
Trancetti di tonno vs Tuńczyk kawałki w oleju...
Trancetti di tonno vs Thon au chili
Century tuna (h) 155g vs Trancetti di tonno
Whole Grain Dijon Mustar... vs Trancetti di tonno
Thon miettes généreuse à... vs Trancetti di tonno
Thon miettes généreuse à... vs Tuna Fillets in brine
Posta de atum dos Açores vs Tuna Fillets in brine