Thunfischsalat - Mexico vs Sałatka z makrelą, pikantna.
Overall, Thunfischsalat - Mexico has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Thunfischsalat - Mexico | Sałatka z makrelą, pikantna. |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 191 kcal | 134 kcal |
| Fat | 12 g | 7.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 1.6 g | 6.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 9.4 g | 8.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sałatka z makrelą, pikantna. has 30% fewer calories (134 kcal vs 191 kcal).
- Sałatka z makrelą, pikantna. has 38% less fat (7.4 g vs 12 g).
- Thunfischsalat - Mexico has 44% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 1.6 g).
- Thunfischsalat - Mexico has 76% less sugar (1.6 g vs 6.6 g).
- Thunfischsalat - Mexico has no salt, while Sałatka z makrelą, pikantna. has 1.5 g.
- Thunfischsalat - Mexico has 11% more protein (9.4 g vs 8.4 g).
- Thunfischsalat - Mexico has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Sałatka z makrelą, pikantna. lists: Fish, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Thunfischsalat - Mexico
Not available.
Sałatka z makrelą, pikantna.
Atlantic Salmon (Fish) (28%) (Salmo salar), Water, White Cabbage, Carrot, White Rice, Onion, Rapeseed Oil, Tomato Paste, Soy Fiber, Sugar, Salt, Spirit Vinegar, Dried Onion, Spices and Spice Extract
FAQ
Which is healthier: Thunfischsalat - Mexico or Sałatka z makrelą, pikantna.?
Overall, Thunfischsalat - Mexico has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sałatka z makrelą, pikantna. has fewer calories: 134 kcal versus 191 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Thunfischsalat - Mexico has less sugar: 1.6 g versus 6.6 g per 100 g.