Sałatka z makrelą, pikantna. vs Antipasto con tonno in salsa
Overall, Antipasto con tonno in salsa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sałatka z makrelą, pikantna. | Antipasto con tonno in salsa |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 134 kcal | 60 kcal |
| Fat | 7.4 g | 4.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 6.6 g | 3.8 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 1.8 g |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | — |
| Protein | 8.4 g | 0.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Fish, Soybeans | Fish, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Antipasto con tonno in salsa has 55% fewer calories (60 kcal vs 134 kcal).
- Antipasto con tonno in salsa has 36% less fat (4.7 g vs 7.4 g).
- Antipasto con tonno in salsa has 69% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1.6 g).
- Antipasto con tonno in salsa has 42% less sugar (3.8 g vs 6.6 g).
- Sałatka z makrelą, pikantna. has 17% less salt (1.5 g vs 1.8 g).
- Sałatka z makrelą, pikantna. has 96% more protein (8.4 g vs 0.3 g).
- Only Sałatka z makrelą, pikantna. lists: Soybeans.
- Only Antipasto con tonno in salsa lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Sałatka z makrelą, pikantna.
Atlantic Salmon (Fish) (28%) (Salmo salar), Water, White Cabbage, Carrot, White Rice, Onion, Rapeseed Oil, Tomato Paste, Soy Fiber, Sugar, Salt, Spirit Vinegar, Dried Onion, Spices and Spice Extract
Antipasto con tonno in salsa
Ortaggi misti (cetrioli, carciofini, peperoni, carote, olive, cipolline, cavolfiore, funghi coltivati "Agaricus bisporus", capperi), solfiti, passata di pomodoro, tonno 8%, olio di semi di girasole, zucchero, aceto di vino, sale, vino bianco, salsa Worcester (pesce), aromi naturali, spezie, regolatore di acidità: acido lattico, antiossidante: acido ascorbico
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sałatka z makrelą, pikantna. or Antipasto con tonno in salsa?
Overall, Antipasto con tonno in salsa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Antipasto con tonno in salsa has fewer calories: 60 kcal versus 134 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Antipasto con tonno in salsa has less sugar: 3.8 g versus 6.6 g per 100 g.