Thunfischsalat Mexiko vs Sałatka z makrelą, pikantna.
Overall, Thunfischsalat Mexiko has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 9 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Thunfischsalat Mexiko | Sałatka z makrelą, pikantna. |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 105 kcal | 134 kcal |
| Fat | 2.3 g | 7.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 2.4 g | 6.6 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 3.1 g | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 9.4 g | 8.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Thunfischsalat Mexiko has 22% fewer calories (105 kcal vs 134 kcal).
- Thunfischsalat Mexiko has 69% less fat (2.3 g vs 7.4 g).
- Thunfischsalat Mexiko has 88% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 1.6 g).
- Thunfischsalat Mexiko has 64% less sugar (2.4 g vs 6.6 g).
- Thunfischsalat Mexiko has 43% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.5 g).
- Thunfischsalat Mexiko has 77% more fiber (3.1 g vs 0.7 g).
- Thunfischsalat Mexiko has 11% more protein (9.4 g vs 8.4 g).
- Thunfischsalat Mexiko has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Sałatka z makrelą, pikantna. lists: Fish, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Thunfischsalat Mexiko
Not available.
Sałatka z makrelą, pikantna.
Atlantic Salmon (Fish) (28%) (Salmo salar), Water, White Cabbage, Carrot, White Rice, Onion, Rapeseed Oil, Tomato Paste, Soy Fiber, Sugar, Salt, Spirit Vinegar, Dried Onion, Spices and Spice Extract
FAQ
Which is healthier: Thunfischsalat Mexiko or Sałatka z makrelą, pikantna.?
Overall, Thunfischsalat Mexiko has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Thunfischsalat Mexiko has fewer calories: 105 kcal versus 134 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Thunfischsalat Mexiko has less sugar: 2.4 g versus 6.6 g per 100 g.