Steinofenbrot, Harry 1688 vs Fasola czerwona konserwowa
Overall, Fasola czerwona konserwowa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Steinofenbrot, Harry 1688
Fasola czerwona konserwowa
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Steinofenbrot, Harry 1688 | Fasola czerwona konserwowa |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 220 kcal | 101 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.7 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 5.2 g | 7 g |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 7.3 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fasola czerwona konserwowa has 54% fewer calories (101 kcal vs 220 kcal).
- Fasola czerwona konserwowa has 67% less fat (0.5 g vs 1.5 g).
- Steinofenbrot, Harry 1688 has 15% less sugar (1.7 g vs 2 g).
- Fasola czerwona konserwowa has 26% more fiber (7 g vs 5.2 g).
- Fasola czerwona konserwowa has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Steinofenbrot, Harry 1688 lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Steinofenbrot, Harry 1688
Weizenmehl, Natursauerteig (Wasser, Roggenvollkornmehl, Roggenmehl, Weizenmehl), Wasser, Roggenmehl, Salz, Hefe, Roggenmalzmehl, Säureregulator: Natriumacetate.
Fasola czerwona konserwowa
fasola czerwona, woda, sól
FAQ
Which is healthier: Steinofenbrot, Harry 1688 or Fasola czerwona konserwowa?
Overall, Fasola czerwona konserwowa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fasola czerwona konserwowa has fewer calories: 101 kcal versus 220 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Steinofenbrot, Harry 1688 has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 2 g per 100 g.