Speisequark 40% vs Arki Pehmeä Rahka
Overall, Arki Pehmeä Rahka has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Speisequark 40% | Arki Pehmeä Rahka |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 142 kcal | 59 kcal |
| Fat | 10 g | 0.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.9 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 3.2 g | 3.8 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 9 g | 9.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Arki Pehmeä Rahka has 58% fewer calories (59 kcal vs 142 kcal).
- Arki Pehmeä Rahka has 94% less fat (0.6 g vs 10 g).
- Arki Pehmeä Rahka has 94% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 6.9 g).
- Speisequark 40% has 16% less sugar (3.2 g vs 3.8 g).
- Arki Pehmeä Rahka has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Arki Pehmeä Rahka lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Speisequark 40%
Not available.
Arki Pehmeä Rahka
Pastöroitu kirnumaito, rasvaton maito, hapate
FAQ
Which is healthier: Speisequark 40% or Arki Pehmeä Rahka?
Overall, Arki Pehmeä Rahka has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Arki Pehmeä Rahka has fewer calories: 59 kcal versus 142 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Speisequark 40% has less sugar: 3.2 g versus 3.8 g per 100 g.