Comparison

Speisequark 40% vs Arki Pehmeä Rahka

Overall, Arki Pehmeä Rahka has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSpeisequark 40%Arki Pehmeä Rahka
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group — 1
Calories 142 kcal 59 kcal
Fat 10 g 0.6 g
Saturated fat 6.9 g 0.4 g
Sugars 3.2 g 3.8 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Protein 9 g 9.2 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Arki Pehmeä Rahka has 58% fewer calories (59 kcal vs 142 kcal).
  • Arki Pehmeä Rahka has 94% less fat (0.6 g vs 10 g).
  • Arki Pehmeä Rahka has 94% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 6.9 g).
  • Speisequark 40% has 16% less sugar (3.2 g vs 3.8 g).
  • Arki Pehmeä Rahka has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Arki Pehmeä Rahka lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Speisequark 40%

Not available.

Arki Pehmeä Rahka

Pastöroitu kirnumaito, rasvaton maito, hapate

FAQ

Which is healthier: Speisequark 40% or Arki Pehmeä Rahka?

Overall, Arki Pehmeä Rahka has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Arki Pehmeä Rahka has fewer calories: 59 kcal versus 142 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Speisequark 40% has less sugar: 3.2 g versus 3.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons