Speisequark 40 % Fett vs Arki Pehmeä Rahka
Overall, Arki Pehmeä Rahka has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Speisequark 40 % Fett | Arki Pehmeä Rahka |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 142 kcal | 59 kcal |
| Fat | 9.8 g | 0.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.7 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 3.5 g | 3.8 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 9.3 g | 9.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Arki Pehmeä Rahka has 58% fewer calories (59 kcal vs 142 kcal).
- Arki Pehmeä Rahka has 94% less fat (0.6 g vs 9.8 g).
- Arki Pehmeä Rahka has 94% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 6.7 g).
- Arki Pehmeä Rahka has the better Nutri-Score.
- Arki Pehmeä Rahka is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Speisequark 40 % Fett
_Magermilch_, _Sahne_, Milchsäurekulturen (enthalten _Milch_), mikrobieller Labaustauschstoff.
Arki Pehmeä Rahka
Pastöroitu kirnumaito, rasvaton maito, hapate
FAQ
Which is healthier: Speisequark 40 % Fett or Arki Pehmeä Rahka?
Overall, Arki Pehmeä Rahka has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Arki Pehmeä Rahka has fewer calories: 59 kcal versus 142 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Speisequark 40 % Fett has less sugar: 3.5 g versus 3.8 g per 100 g.